US transfers $429m for Iron Dome
It is increasingly apparent that there is no appetite in either the United States or Israel at this time to go to war with Iran.
It is increasingly apparent that there is no appetite in either the United States or Israel at this time to go to war with Iran by attacking the Iranian nuclear facilities.
For the time being, the June elections in Iran are used as a reason not to attack, on the grounds that the intentions of the new government should be ascertained first, even though the struggle will be between clerical extremists and non-clerical extremists. Both sides have proclaimed that developing a nuclear capacity is Iran's right. The most fanatical elements would actively welcome a nuclear Armageddon as hastening the advent of the Mahdi.
The United States has developed an updated bunker-buster bomb, capable supposedly of penetrating even the Fordow and Natanz facilities. Secretary of Defense Hagel was careful to emphasize this capability to Defense Minister Ayalon during the latter's visit to Washington. The purpose, obviously, was to convince the Israelis that those facilities can be destroyed any time, and therefore there is no need for pre-emptive action in the foreseeable future.
The successful tests of the Arrow-3 anti-missile missile in Israel presumably mean that at some point not long from now Israel will be able to protect itself from nuclear attack by Iran (or anyone else) while retaliating in kind. This was the calculation, after the Reagan administration began development of the "star wars" anti-missile system, that convinced the Gorbachev government in Moscow that "mutual assured destruction" (MAD) was no longer a viable strategy for them, and, along with several other measures taken by the US government in pursuance of a well-designed and comprehensive strategic plan, led to the end of the Cold War with a US victory, and eventually to the disintegration of the Soviet Bloc and the Soviet Union itself.
The result of all of this is to make an attack by the US, Israel, or both, very unlikely any time in the foreseeable future, and very possibly at all. Is this a good or bad thing? The answer depends on the reliability of the enhanced bunker buster and the schedule for the production of the Arrow--3 in quantity. The Iranian election is only relevant if it leads to all--out conflict between the two reactionary factions in that country. This is a possibility, and if it happens, the eventual outcome and its significance for the strategic balance in the region is unknowable at this time.
Norman A. Bailey, Ph.D., is Adjunct Professor of Economic Statecraft at The Institute of World Politics, Washington, DC, and a researcher at the Center for National Security Studies, University of Haifa.
Published by Globes [online], Israel business news - www.globes-online.com - on May 9, 2013
© Copyright of Globes Publisher Itonut (1983) Ltd. 2013
You comment was recieved and soon will be published.
Load more comments
The funds are for procurement of the short-range missile interceptor systems.
Gov't set to approve Israel-US tax pact
The economic social cabinet will soon approve the information sharing agreement with the US IRS.
Netanyahu: We won't abandon housing front
The prime minister promises to be as active on economic as on diplomatic problems.
Republican claims on Israel missile cuts unfounded
Republican allegations that Obama has reduced funding to joint US-Israeli missile defense programs are inaccurate.
Israel and California sign R&D agreement
The agreement covers water, cyber security, energy and storage technology.
Truth is proving stranger than folktale as Turkey's spins out of Prime Minister Erdogan's control.
Prof. Zvi Eckstein supports NIS 3.30-3.40/$ floor rate
The former deputy Bank of Israel Governor is the first senior figure from the financial system to advocate a floor rate.
2014 will be year of change
Forces reshaping the Middle East are coming to a head, with Russia taking a close interest, and the West seemingly indifferent.
Gains and losses for Middle East secularists
Recent developments in Egypt, Syria and Turkey have clarified some issues, and obfuscated others.
Developing robots for warfare
Israeli research sees the future battlefield dominated by robots and unmanned devices.
Geneva changes Middle East strategic map
As the consequences of the nuclear agreement with Iran emerge, regional powers are scrambling to adapt.
Egypt has no time to lose
Unless economic reforms are introduced quickly, the country is liable to relapse into Islamic extremism.
Strange goings on in Turkey
Two recent decisions by Turkish prime minister Erdoğan make it look as though he is losing his grip.
See you in six months, Rouhani
Israel may look isolated over the nuclear deal with Iran, but the cards could yet fall its way.
China is changing
The Third Plenum of the Communist Party of the Peoples' Republic of China marks a turning-point in all areas of Chinese life - with consequences for Israel.
French gov't proposes building 2 Tel Aviv light rail lines
The Green Line from Herzliya to Holon and the Purple Line from Kiryat Ono to Tel Aviv would cost NIS 30 billion to build.
Israel's factious coalition looks wobbly on Iran
Besides US opposition, the state of Israel's government makes an attack on Iran unlikely.
Budget cuts threaten 10,000 defense industry jobs
Senior executives warn many factories are in danger of closing due to the drying up of defense ministry's orders.