Netanyahu: The boys were kidnapped by Hamas
Israel fears a bad deal could be struck between the US and Iran, writes former IDF Intelligence chief Maj. Gen. (res.) Amos Yadlin.
The round of talks between the six powers and Iran over its nuclear program was held in Istanbul, and another round is scheduled in May. Despite a decade of empty dialogue, both sides have an interest in holding negotiations: Iran seeks to avoid a tightening of the sanctions against it, and US President Barack Obama wants to postpone hard decisions, at least until after the elections. Although the two sides' opening positions are far apart, it is in the nature of negotiations to bring the position of the parties closer. Both sides have a clear interest in creating the image of a successful process, if only to push back the option of an Israeli strike.
The assessment is that any possible deal would include Iran's right to uranium enrichment on its territory. The difference between a "good" deal and a "bad" deal is not the legitimization of enrichment, but the parameters that will prevent a "breakthrough" to a nuclear weapon, which will stop the clock, or even turn it back, and do not allow Iran to enter the zone of immunity, thereby making feasible the non-military option for stopping Iran's military nuclear program.
Between a "good" and "bad" deal
A "good" deal would include significant restrictions on continued uranium enrichment in Iran, removal of most of the enriched uranium from the country, closing the underground facility on the mountain near Qom, and Iranian consent to intrusive supervision. Such a deal promises that an Iran breakthrough to a nuclear weapon will be far off, and therefore outside the zone of immunity. Such a deal does not meet the maximum demands previously made of Iran, but it is better than the alternative of a Bomb or bombing. Nonetheless, the likelihood that Iran will agree to the terms are very low.
A "bad" deal, which the Iranians will probably propose, and which the powers will be tempted to take, will include explicit international legitimization of Iranian uranium enrichment on its territory up to 5%, but will exclude the removal of most of the enriched uranium and will not limit the number of centrifuges and enrichment sites. At the same time, Iran will be able to continue to protect its sites by hardening them against attack.
In such a deal, Iran will be able to improve its capabilities for a breakthrough to a nuclear weapon within a short time from the moment a decision is made to do so. If the sides agree to a deal along such lines, it will be a "bad" deal, because, in practice, it will essentially mean acceptance of the current situation in which Iran stays on the brink of developing a nuclear weapon. At the same time, the international pressure on it will be lifted, the sanctions will be suspended or eroded, and Iran will obtain "diplomatic immunity" from military action against it.
Israel will find it difficult to accept a situation in which Iran can at any moment decide to make the breakthrough to quickly develop a nuclear weapon. But international legitimization of Iran's nuclear capability will put Israel in a difficult strategic dilemma, because it will find it hard to justify an attack aimed at damaging this capability.
The US red line refers to an actual Iranian breakthrough toward a nuclear weapon, and the Americans say that they will know of this in advance. Jerusalem is not sure, and it is not prepared to take the risk. The result is that reaching a compromise with Iran means widening the differences and disputes between Israel and the US. While Israel's semiofficial red line is quite clear, and Iran is liable to cross it soon, the US red line is very blurry and hard to distinguish, but it conforms with US policy which seeks to postpone the day of reckoning, at least until after the November elections.
The writer, an IDF major general (res.) is the director of Israel's Institute for National Security Studies and former head of Military Intelligence.
Published by Globes [online], Israel business news - www.globes-online.com - on April 24, 2012
© Copyright of Globes Publisher Itonut (1983) Ltd. 2012
You comment was recieved and soon will be published.
Thank you for posting your comment, which will be reviewed for publication.
Load more comments
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu threatens "dire consequences" following the kidnapping.
Questions over police response to kidnapping
Hours passed before a search operation was launched. Netanyahu holds Palestinians responsible.
Netanyahu bought furniture at public expense - report
"Yediot Ahronot": Attorney General is investigating if Netanyahu family bought furniture for its Caesarea private home.
Binyamin Ben-Eliezer questioned by police again
Ben-Eliezer's son Yariv is also suspected of receiving money from Avraham Nanikashvili.
Reuven Rivlin elected president
Rivlin defeated Meir Sheetrit 63:53 in the second round vote in the Knesset.
Meir Sheetrit discloses owning five homes
The Presidential candidate has bowed to public pressure and declared his assets.
Police find $600,000 cash in Ben-Eliezer's bank
The source of the money found in Binyamin Ben-Eliezer's safety deposit box is unclear.
Presidential candidate Ruby Rivlin discloses assets
Dalia Dorner also disclosed her wealth, but Meir Sheetrit refused.
Dalia Itzik bought Tel Aviv home for NIS 4.6m last year
The Presidential candidate and former Knesset Speaker also owns two apartments in Jerusalem.
The venture capitalist who wants to transform Israel
Labor MK Erel Margalit tells "Globes" about his plans to improve the Start-Up Nation.
Combat cameramen disprove Palestinian propaganda
A unit of highly trained combat soldiers uses cameras to document military operations.
Truth is proving stranger than folktale as Turkey's spins out of Prime Minister Erdogan's control.
Prof. Zvi Eckstein supports NIS 3.30-3.40/$ floor rate
The former deputy Bank of Israel Governor is the first senior figure from the financial system to advocate a floor rate.
2014 will be year of change
Forces reshaping the Middle East are coming to a head, with Russia taking a close interest, and the West seemingly indifferent.
Gains and losses for Middle East secularists
Recent developments in Egypt, Syria and Turkey have clarified some issues, and obfuscated others.
Developing robots for warfare
Israeli research sees the future battlefield dominated by robots and unmanned devices.
Geneva changes Middle East strategic map
As the consequences of the nuclear agreement with Iran emerge, regional powers are scrambling to adapt.
Egypt has no time to lose
Unless economic reforms are introduced quickly, the country is liable to relapse into Islamic extremism.
Strange goings on in Turkey
Two recent decisions by Turkish prime minister Erdoğan make it look as though he is losing his grip.
See you in six months, Rouhani
Israel may look isolated over the nuclear deal with Iran, but the cards could yet fall its way.
China is changing
The Third Plenum of the Communist Party of the Peoples' Republic of China marks a turning-point in all areas of Chinese life - with consequences for Israel.
French gov't proposes building 2 Tel Aviv light rail lines
The Green Line from Herzliya to Holon and the Purple Line from Kiryat Ono to Tel Aviv would cost NIS 30 billion to build.
Israel's factious coalition looks wobbly on Iran
Besides US opposition, the state of Israel's government makes an attack on Iran unlikely.
Budget cuts threaten 10,000 defense industry jobs
Senior executives warn many factories are in danger of closing due to the drying up of defense ministry's orders.