Netanyahu: The boys were kidnapped by Hamas
It is quite possible that Obama's own agenda has issues that he will not want to jeopardize with a confrontation with Israel and the Palestinians.
When I read the reports about the upcoming visit by US President Barack Obama, I cannot understand why he wants to come here. It is not that I have anything against it; a visit by this man is always a good show, because he is a superb performer. He strongly reminds me of former President Bill Clinton in this regard. Nonetheless, he is not coming for a round of guest lectures; he is a serious, very serious, man, and he is very busy. We can therefore assume that when a man like him departs on such a voyage, it is because there is something very important that he wants to say or do.
But the reports stubbornly insist that that is not case. On the contrary, every mention of a possibility of moving forward on talks with the Palestinians is immediately denied, almost in a panic. No, no, not at all. A new peace initiative? No, really no, promises the US ambassador to Tel Aviv. The White House spokesman also says that Obama has no new peace initiative.
Unless we are talking about the peace process between Obama and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Most assessments focus on this peace process, and some sources - only the highest of course - say that this is the main objective of the presidential trip. The veteran peace negotiator Dennis Ross believes that Obama is coming to get a new start after the elections, to prove to the public that "he is serious". If that is cast, the president is wasting his time. Any peace with Netanyahu will be very short lived, due to natural causes and his coalition partners. It will not take long until Netanyahu, either willingly or not, undertakes some settlement venture that will displease Obama, and the inter-personal peace will be over.
Why no diplomatic initiative?
After listening to all the commentary about Obama's motives for visiting the Middle East, the question has to be asked: Why not? In other words, why no new initiative or peace plan, or even an old one? Conventional wisdom holds that if we're talking about a new start, in other words, a new government, then maybe this is actually the time for a new initiative too. Any kind of plan.
Obama unquestionably understands this. Like his predecessors, he would love to come with a plan and tell all the sides: "This is it, more or less. See it and bless it." Or something like that. You can talk about the plan, of course, have reservations and requests, but only at the margins, because on the substance, there is nothing to talk about. This is what we're offering; demanding. If someone does not want it, by all means, but he'll have to bear the consequences.
Compulsion is not ideal
This is compulsion, you say? Absolutely. But it is also possible to say that this is the only way to get somewhere. Waiting for the two sides to do it has already been tried and failed. Compulsion is not ideal, of course, but peace is ideal, and you want it, you have to take practical steps, not pretty steps that go nowhere.
Obviously, such steps by the US President will infuriate powerful and influential parties, not only in Israel and in the Arab world, but within his own country, in his Congress, which is strongly influenced by the Jewish lobby. Such a step is also a headache, without question. But Obama has already proven that he has the courage to go against the big and the powerful, when he passed his healthcare reform, which was so controversial in the US.
The question is just how important peace is to Obama. It is quite possible that his own agenda has issues that he will not want to jeopardize with a confrontation with Israel and the Palestinians. This is quite possible, and even understandable. The fact that he is not bringing some diplomatic plan points in this direction. He also wants to get through his presidency without too much noise and alarms. This passes the buck to us, the Israelis and the Palestinians, which means, what was, will be.
Published by Globes [online], Israel business news - www.globes-online.com - on February 7, 2013
© Copyright of Globes Publisher Itonut (1983) Ltd. 2013
You comment was recieved and soon will be published.
Thank you for posting your comment, which will be reviewed for publication.
Load more comments
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu threatens "dire consequences" following the kidnapping.
Questions over police response to kidnapping
Hours passed before a search operation was launched. Netanyahu holds Palestinians responsible.
Netanyahu bought furniture at public expense - report
"Yediot Ahronot": Attorney General is investigating if Netanyahu family bought furniture for its Caesarea private home.
Binyamin Ben-Eliezer questioned by police again
Ben-Eliezer's son Yariv is also suspected of receiving money from Avraham Nanikashvili.
Reuven Rivlin elected president
Rivlin defeated Meir Sheetrit 63:53 in the second round vote in the Knesset.
Meir Sheetrit discloses owning five homes
The Presidential candidate has bowed to public pressure and declared his assets.
Police find $600,000 cash in Ben-Eliezer's bank
The source of the money found in Binyamin Ben-Eliezer's safety deposit box is unclear.
Presidential candidate Ruby Rivlin discloses assets
Dalia Dorner also disclosed her wealth, but Meir Sheetrit refused.
Dalia Itzik bought Tel Aviv home for NIS 4.6m last year
The Presidential candidate and former Knesset Speaker also owns two apartments in Jerusalem.
The venture capitalist who wants to transform Israel
Labor MK Erel Margalit tells "Globes" about his plans to improve the Start-Up Nation.
Combat cameramen disprove Palestinian propaganda
A unit of highly trained combat soldiers uses cameras to document military operations.
Truth is proving stranger than folktale as Turkey's spins out of Prime Minister Erdogan's control.
Prof. Zvi Eckstein supports NIS 3.30-3.40/$ floor rate
The former deputy Bank of Israel Governor is the first senior figure from the financial system to advocate a floor rate.
2014 will be year of change
Forces reshaping the Middle East are coming to a head, with Russia taking a close interest, and the West seemingly indifferent.
Gains and losses for Middle East secularists
Recent developments in Egypt, Syria and Turkey have clarified some issues, and obfuscated others.
Developing robots for warfare
Israeli research sees the future battlefield dominated by robots and unmanned devices.
Geneva changes Middle East strategic map
As the consequences of the nuclear agreement with Iran emerge, regional powers are scrambling to adapt.
Egypt has no time to lose
Unless economic reforms are introduced quickly, the country is liable to relapse into Islamic extremism.
Strange goings on in Turkey
Two recent decisions by Turkish prime minister Erdoğan make it look as though he is losing his grip.
See you in six months, Rouhani
Israel may look isolated over the nuclear deal with Iran, but the cards could yet fall its way.
China is changing
The Third Plenum of the Communist Party of the Peoples' Republic of China marks a turning-point in all areas of Chinese life - with consequences for Israel.
French gov't proposes building 2 Tel Aviv light rail lines
The Green Line from Herzliya to Holon and the Purple Line from Kiryat Ono to Tel Aviv would cost NIS 30 billion to build.
Israel's factious coalition looks wobbly on Iran
Besides US opposition, the state of Israel's government makes an attack on Iran unlikely.
Budget cuts threaten 10,000 defense industry jobs
Senior executives warn many factories are in danger of closing due to the drying up of defense ministry's orders.